Connect product requirements, development activities, and technical information from concept to launch. Give product, R&D, packaging, and quality teams a shared foundation for developing products and assessing readiness.
New product development brings together commercial expectations, technical uncertainty, and contributions from multiple functions. Gaps between these inputs can delay decisions and create avoidable rework.
Formulation, packaging, and specification work progress separately, making it difficult to assess the product as a whole.
Teams spend review meetings finding documents and reconciling versions instead of resolving development questions.
Ingredient constraints, packaging compatibility, or missing evidence emerge when the product is already expected to be ready.
Earlier trials and product decisions are difficult to recover, leading teams to repeat work.
A consistent NPD process gives teams clarity on what they are developing, what each stage must produce, and what information is needed to move forward.
Establish the intended product, target attributes, commercial boundaries, and market requirements. Keep the brief accessible as technical development progresses.
Organize the initiative into development stages with identifiable deliverables. Bring technical product work into the same project context as the activities needed to complete it.
Bring together the formulations, material specifications, finished-product specifications, packaging, and documents contributed by different teams.
Assess development outcomes against the brief using the relevant product versions and supporting records. Identify unresolved questions before committing further work.
Each phase produces information that the next phase depends on. Plevenn helps teams carry that information through development.
All product information is accessible in one place, reducing errors and rework.
Teams across locations and functions work together in real time.
Easily adapt to changing business needs without infrastructure constraints.
Eliminates the need for on-premises hardware, reducing IT and operational costs.
Strong encryption and access controls ensure data protection and regulatory alignment.
Streamlined workflows and real-time visibility accelerate product launches.
Every function contributes a different part of the product. Their work must stay connected as development evolves.
Maintain the development brief and intended product requirements. Bring commercial expectations and customer inputs into the development discussion.
Develop formulations, prepare trials and refine technical specifications. Carry findings forward as the product evolves.
Develop packaging specifications alongside the evolving product. Keep packaging requirements and supporting assessments accessible to the wider team.
Review relevant specifications and supporting documentation against applicable requirements. Identify the evidence and outstanding questions that need attention.
Access the product specifications and preparation instructions needed for handover. Bring operational questions into development reviews.
| Review area | Questions to resolve | Information to bring into the review |
|---|---|---|
| Requirements | Does the current product definition reflect the agreed brief? Which requirements have changed? | The development brief, target attributes, and current product specifications. |
| Technical Feasibility | Can the proposed formulation achieve the intended performance? Which assumptions still need testing? | The formulation version being evaluated, relevant material specifications, and trial findings. |
| Commercial Fit | Can the product meet the commercial boundaries set in the brief? How do proposed changes affect those boundaries? | Target cost, ingredient choices, packaging requirements, and supporting commercial assessments. |
| Material Suitability | Do the selected materials meet the product requirements? What needs to be evaluated if a material changes? | Material specifications, supplier documentation and proposed alternatives in the formulation context. |
| Claims Support | Does the available evidence support the intended positioning? What further substantiation is needed? | Proposed claims, supporting documentation and questions for specialist assessment. |
| Packaging Compatibility | Will the product and packaging work together as intended? What compatibility or dispensing questions remain? | Packaging specifications, relevant product attributes and compatibility findings. |
| Validation | What do the trials and test reports establish? What further development or testing is required? | Trial findings, test reports and the associated product information. |
| Handover Readiness | Are the required records complete and at the appropriate status? What remains outstanding? | The selected formulas, specifications, packaging records, instructions and supporting documentation. |
Support the NPD process with the capabilities needed to develop and maintain the product itself.
Organize development stages and bring the brief, product records, and supporting deliverables into a shared project.
Create a structured and comprehensive product portfolio that helps with decision-making and strategic planning.
Manage required product data and all associated components, including ingredients, materials, packaging, and co-products.
Organize development stages and bring the brief, product records, and supporting deliverables into a shared project.
Define, manage, and version all your packaging in a single, centralized platform, Control every layer of your packaging from bottle to pallet
Organize development documents, maintain file versions and make supporting information accessible to the team.
NPD covers bringing a new or improved product from an initial brief to launch. Product lifecycle management provides the information foundation for that work and for subsequent product changes. In Plevenn, development projects bring together product records such as formulations, specifications, packaging and supporting documents.
Not necessarily. The scope of development and validation should reflect the nature of the initiative. A new product formulation may require substantial feasibility work and trials. A line extension may reuse an established base while focusing on the consequences of specific changes. Define the work and evidence required for the initiative's scope.
Development often returns to earlier questions. A trial finding may require a formulation revision; a packaging assessment may change the intended format. Stages provide an overall structure, while versions and supporting records help teams preserve each iteration's context.
Yes. Existing product formulations and specifications provide a starting point for related development work. Teams can adapt established product information and maintain revisions as they address new requirements.
Follow a representative development initiative: establish the brief, organize the project, develop a formulation, prepare a trial batch, maintain specifications, and bring the product information together for review. This shows how the software supports the work your teams actually perform.